Archive 2nd semester 2001

Back Home Up

Debate 2001'1112 a
Debate 2001'1115 a
Debate 2001'1116 a
Debate 2001'1224 a

This page contains links to documents formerly published in the debate we've found useful and collected here for your convenience.

2nd semester 2001

Each entry has a title, a summary, a date of publication or when it was last updated, and links to the material in various formats. Each entry also has its bookmark noted, to help authors making links to it from other web pages.

Documents

Substantial equivalence: Its uses and abuses

Henry I. Miller: These are trying times for biotechnology applied to agriculture and food production. Most recently, the accepted paradigms for genetically modified food risk assessment and management have come under...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ Nature Biotechnology 17, 1042-1043 (1999)

Beyond 'substantial equivalence

Erik Millstone, Eric Brunner, Sue Mayer: Showing that a genetically modified food is chemically similar to its natural counterpart is not adequate evidence that it is safe for human consumption. ...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ Nature 401, 525 - 526 (1999) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Conventional crops are the test of GM prejudice 

Anthony Trewavas, C. J. Leaver: Millstone et al., in their Commentary in last week's issue, claim that 'substantial equivalence', a rule governing toxicity testing of genetically modified (GM) crops, is a pseud...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ 401, 640(1999)© Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Substantial equivalence is a useful tool

Peter Kearns, Paul Mayers: We would like to respond to last week's Commentary in which Millstone et al. incorrectly assert that: "Substantial equivalence is a pseudo-scientific concept because it is a commercial...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ 401, 640 (1999) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

No GM conspiracy 

Derek Burke: Last week's Commentary by Millstone et al. is misleading and inaccurate. The authors do not seem to be aware of a meeting organized by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Developm...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ 401, 640-641 (1999) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Genetically modified foods face rigorous safety evaluation

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ Nature 402, 229 (1999) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Seeking clarity in the debate over the safety of GM foods

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ Nature 402, 475-476 (1999) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

How nature itself uses genetic modification

Anthony Trewavas, Christopher Leaver: Mae Wan Ho states that genetic engineering is fundamentally different from conventional plant breeding or wide crosses to produce novel crops; thus she concludes that genetically modified (GM) pla...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ Nature 403, 12 (2000) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

SCIENCE, NEW FOODS AND PUBLIC POLICY

Calestous Juma: Using the Concept of Substantial Equivalence

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (115 k)
Bookmark:     Juma.pdf

US academy study finds GM foods are safe

Colin Macilwain: There is no scientific evidence that crops genetically-modified to resist pests pose special health or environmental risks, according to the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences....

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ 404, 693 (2000) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

but critics claim the panel was biased 

Colin Macilwain: Pressure groups opposed to agricultural biotechnology are working to undermine the impact of the academy's report on genetically-modified crops....
Nature 404, 693 (13 April 2000)

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      HTML
Bookmark:     http://www.nature.com/ 404, 693(2000) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

GM FOOD CROPS AND APPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Schenkelaars Biotechnology Consultancy, The Netherlands, June 2001

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (827 k)
Bookmark:     SBCstudy2001.pdf

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, PESTICIDES, AND THE PREVENTION OF CANCER: MISCONCEPTIONS

Bruce N. Ames and Lois Swirsky Gold: Various misconceptions about the relationship between environmental pollution and human disease, particularly cancer, drive regulatory policy. We highlight nine such misconceptions and briefly present the scientific evidence that undermines each...

Date:         July 4, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (74 k)
Bookmark:     AmesMisconc.pdf

ESF Scientific Programme: Assessment of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Plants (AIGM)

WORKSHOP: Risk assessment methods for genetically modified plants - current trends and new developments Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic 13-15 September, 2001

Date:         July 9, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (81 k)
Bookmark:     PragMonitor.pdf

Public Attitudes towards Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries - A Comparison between Mexico and the Philippines

Philipp Aerni: Though the public debate on the potential risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology is discussed globally, it is often reduced to a transatlantic debate with the United States as the main producer of bioengineered crops and Europe as the main opponent to such crops. Developing countries often find themselves in an uncomfortable position in the middle...

Date:         July 10, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (81 k), .ppt (731 k)
Bookmark:     AerniHarvard20010710.pdf

Human Development Report 2001

United Nations Development Programme: New technologies key to reducing world poverty

Date:         July 14, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (1'136 k), .ppt (2'197 k)
Bookmark:     UNDPreport.pdf

Comment:  UNDP-Report

Henry I. Miller and Gregory Conko: There is much to applaud about the view of agricultural biotechnology in the U.N.s report, "Making New Technologies Work for Human Development” (Editorial comment: Technology and Poverty," 10 July), but...

Date:         July 17, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (35 k)
Bookmark:     MillerConcoUNDPcomment.pdf

TOWARDS A STRATEGIC VISION OF LIFE SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY: CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: Scientific and technological progress in the life sciences and modern biotechnology is continuing at a breathtaking pace. At the same time, the potential benefits and implications for individuals, society and the environment have given rise to intense public debate...

Date:         August 24, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (358 k)
Bookmark:     EUStrategicVision.pdf

THE “POLITICAL ECONOMY” OF AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEVELOPING WORLD

Klaus M. Leisinger: At the beginning of the new millennium, a 150-year-old conceptual skeleton—the “political economy”—is rattling loudly in the closet...

Date:         August 24, 2001
Formats:      .pdf (493 k)
Bookmark:     LeisingPolitEcon.pdf

Organic Farming in Austria 

One of the most important trends of recent decades in Austria was the strong development of environmental awareness.

Date:         November 12, 2001
Debate no:    2001'1112 a
Formats:      .pdf (1'196 k)
Bookmark:     BIOINA_E.PDF

EC-sponsored Research on Safety of Genetically Modified Organisms
A Review of Results (EUR 19884) 

This publication provides a comprehensive review of the results of EC-supported research into the safety of Genetically Modified Organisms. It presents research carried out under successive EC Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development from 1985 (Biotechnology Action Programme) to 2000 (Fifth Framework Programme).
During this period, 81 projects, involving over 400 research teams, have been supported with a combined Community financial contribution of about EUR70 million.

Date:         November 15, 2001
Debate no:    2001'1115 a
Formats:      .htm
Bookmark:     http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/quality-of-life/gmo/index.html

John Hodgsons comments about the Mexican landraces: Doubts linger over Mexican corn analysis

Research at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT; El Batan, Mexico) has cast some doubt on controversial earlier reports that DNA from genetically modified maize has been transferred to local varieties in Mexico. Although the earlier work describes the apparently widespread occurrence of the 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus in locally developed maize varieties, the CIMMYT study could not detect the 35S promoter, either in historical accessions from its extensive seedbank or in samples collected recently from the field in Mexico.

Date:         December 24, 2001
Debate no:    2001'1224 a
Formats:      .ppt (100 k)
Bookmark:     Euro1.ppt
 
Back to Top

For problems or questions regarding this web contact [ProjectEmail].
Last updated: Januar 08, 2002 by the webmaster - Institute of Plant Sciences - University of Bern